I HAD A fun time in Afghanistan working
with people who called themselves journalists but were from artistic
backgrounds like painting, sculpture and poetry and don't even get me started
on American journalists and their 'liberal arts' background.
Like many of today's journalists here in
the UK they had no understanding of the financing of publishing or the
economics of journalism. Write story/publish/sit back/congratulate self/move
on. The readership was a black hole of customers who should think themselves
lucky that they are able to read my words.
|
ON THE JOB: Journalists (poets, sculptors etc) on
assignment in Afghanistan with editor (relaxing) |
Beyond the editor (if not at
lunch/Rotary/important meeting etc), news editor and a few vociferous local
worthies nobody really had a view on whether what you did was good, bad or
indifferent.
Now that pesky internet thing has moved
the goalposts. A weekly newspaper reporter has gone from:
a) Write a story, wait up to six days for it to be
published, see if phone rings or letter
comes in.
to
b) Write a
story, wait 30 seconds to see who is reading it, in 10 minutes rewrite/change
headline/spike as necessary.
So what's so wrong with journalists being
accountable and being measured on what they achieve?
Unprecedented in the industry
Trinity Mirror has done everyone a favour
and come out and said it: “Your performance will be assessed regularly, taking
into account audience traffic to your stories and therefore encompassing page
views, unique users, local audience and other metrics. You will be expected to
grow your page views and uniques in line with the growth we require as a
business,” says a widely leaked internal memo.
Back comes the NUJ’s Birmingham chapel as reported in Press Gazette with: “On the face of it these targets would be unworkable, counter-productive
and unprecedented in the industry."
Yippedeedoo, at long last something "unprecedented in the industry", just what we need to revitalise the
dying patient.
Counting key strokes
Twenty years ago I laboured with some
very senior figures at Thomson Regional Newspapers (TRN) to come up with
workable productivity targets for journalists and just a few years ago one the
great newspaper executives of our time (you may know him: short, Scottish, spectacles)
engineered a scheme which actually counted key strokes.
The legions lined up against the TRN
scheme ("You can't put a figure on
originality", "Genius doesn't count come cheap" or "Doing important background research",) and like a lot of original thinking it foundered for want
of buy-in from those - mainly editors - who would need to make it work.
The key stroke scheme was of course
bonkers, but I did issue some lazy reporters with the threat that "the
system is counting what you do" (it wasn't) with remarkable effect.
Now the sophisticated metrics is doing
all that counting, and in real-time too.
As Trinity Mirror Midlands managing
director Simon Edgley explains: "The proposals we have shared with
colleagues today are quite significant in the change in structure we need to
equip ourselves as a flexible, multi-skilled newsroom of the future.
"The
decision taken to implement these proposals has not been taken lightly, it is
necessary for us to adapt to commercial challenges and provide a structure that
gives longer term sustainability of the business."
Immune from reality
For too long journalists have thought
they are immune from reality. Doing important stuff and getting rewarded from a
pot of money that magically appears from somewhere. Not that I blame them. Not
enough is done on university courses or within industry accredited
qualifications to get new entrants to understand the business of publishing and
with it the business of journalism.
And inside the office (if indeed there
still is one) the demarcation lines between editorial/advertising/circulation
are as obvious as ever so there is little encouragement to find out what those
noisy, bell-ringing, over-dressed people are doing.
Mr Media Commentator, Roy Greenslade, put
it this way: "The cuts reveal a truth that Trinity Mirror
(and other publishers) have previously denied: they are all about private
profit and not about public interest."
T'was ever thus, Roy...